Review Process

EDUTECH Research Journal applies a rigorous evaluation process to maintain publication ethics and quality. The articles submitted to our journal go through the following steps and are decided to be published:

Preliminary Review

Manuscripts are taken into the evaluation process after the preliminary review by the Editor. At this stage, the suitability of the article to the publication principles and scope of our journal is examined. If the article is found suitable for our journal, it is sent to the referees.

Referee Evaluation

The manuscript is evaluated by at least two referees who are experts in their fields. The reviewers examine the scientific validity, consistency and originality of the ideas, methods, results in the article. The identities of the referees are kept confidential from the author of the article and a two-way blind evaluation method is used. Reviewers are obliged to submit their evaluations on the article to our journal within a certain period of time.

Editorial Review

The reports received as a result of the referees' evaluations are analysed by the Editorial Board. According to the evaluation reports, it is decided to publish the article, to publish it with correction or not to publish it.

Author Correction and Revision

If the article is accepted for publication, the authors are obliged to make the corrections and revisions specified by the referees and the Editorial Board. Authors are contacted to resolve deficiencies, inconsistencies or errors in the article. Authors make the final changes. They also fill in the change tables prepared by the Journal of EDUTECH Research.

Final Review and Publication Process

The final version of the article edited by the authors is checked by the Editorial Board for the last time. When the article is found suitable for publication, it is finally prepared for publication and published in our journal. The article is made freely accessible from the online system of our journal.

This evaluation process ensures that the publication quality of our journal is kept high and scientific ethics are protected. Our journal expects everyone involved in the evaluation process to comply with the principles of confidentiality and impartiality.