Edutech Research applies a rigorous and multi-stage evaluation process to ensure publication ethics and high scientific quality standards. All submitted manuscripts are processed through the following stages before a final publication decision is made:
Preliminary Review
Submitted manuscripts are first reviewed by the Editor. At this stage, the manuscript is evaluated in terms of its compliance with the journal’s scope, publication policy, and ethical principles. Manuscripts deemed suitable are forwarded to the peer-review process.
Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the preliminary review are sent to at least two independent experts in the field. A double-blind peer-review process is applied, in which both author and reviewer identities remain confidential.
Reviewers evaluate the scientific validity, methodological consistency, originality, and academic contribution of the manuscript. Review reports are submitted to the editorial office within the specified timeframe.
Editorial Review
Review reports are examined by the Editorial Board. Based on these reports, the manuscript is either accepted, requested for revision, or rejected. The final decision is made by the Editorial Board.
Revision Process
Authors who receive revision requests are required to revise their manuscripts in line with reviewer and editor feedback. Authors must also submit a revision report (change log) detailing the modifications made to the manuscript.
Final Check and Publication Process
The revised manuscript is subjected to a final review by the editors. If deemed suitable for publication, it is prepared for publication and published online in the journal’s open-access platform free of charge.
This evaluation process reflects Edutech Research’s commitment to maintaining scientific quality, ethical standards, and transparency in scholarly publishing. All stages are conducted in accordance with principles of confidentiality, impartiality, and academic integrity.
